The Court (again through Chief Justice Vinson, and again with no dissenters) invalidated the school system—not because it separated students, but rather because the separate facilities were not equal. [16], During the debate in Congress, more than one version of the clause was considered. Under this theory, equal protection jurisprudence has been applied to voting rights. It was also in the Gilded Age that a ruling by the Supreme Court included headnotes written by John C. Bancroft, a former railway company president. . Sumner, Charles, and Daniel Murray Pamphlet Collection. In Washington v. Davis (1976), the Supreme Court ruled that laws or procedures that have a disparate impact (also called an adverse effect), but are facially neutral and do not have discriminatory intent, are valid under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Cram.com makes it easy to get the grade you want! [84], In 2013, the Court struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, in United States v. Windsor. It prohibits the hanging of a black man for a crime for which the white man is not to be hanged. It has inspired the well-known phrase "Equal Justice Under Law". The Act provided that all persons should have "full and equal enjoyment of ... inns, public conveyances on land or water, theatres, and other places of public amusement." The Court may have added other tiers too, such as "enhanced rational basis" scrutiny,[65] and "exceedingly persuasive basis" scrutiny. [88] Likewise, the Equal Protection Clause does not apply to private universities and other private businesses, which are free to practice affirmative action unless prohibited by federal statute or state law. The Supreme Court used four of its rulings from 1960s voting rights cases (one of which was Reynolds v. Sims) to support its ruling in Bush v. Gore. It was not this holding that proved especially controversial among commentators, and indeed, the proposition gained seven out of nine votes; Justices Souter and Breyer joined the majority of five—but only for the finding that there was an Equal Protection violation. The companion cases Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, both decided in 1950, paved the way for a series of school integration cases. In response to Green, many Southern districts replaced freedom-of-choice with geographically based schooling plans; because residential segregation was widespread, little integration was accomplished. Washington: S. & R. O. Polkinhorn, Printers, 1874. [72] This debate, though, is currently academic, since the Supreme Court has not changed its basic approach as outlined in Arlington Heights. In 1971, the Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education approved busing as a remedy to segregation; three years later, though, in the case of Milliken v. Bradley (1974), it set aside a lower court order that had required the busing of students between districts, instead of merely within a district. Citation22 Ill.404 U.S. 71, 92 S. Ct. 251, 30 L. Ed. A few years later, Justice Stanley Matthews wrote the Court's opinion in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886). The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires the United States government to practice equal protection. In Sweatt, the Court considered the constitutionality of Texas's state system of law schools, which educated blacks and whites at separate institutions. A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. Bancroft, acting as court reporter, indicated in the headnotes that corporations were "persons", while the actual court decision itself avoided specific statements regarding the Equal Protection Clause as applied to corporations. Qualifications of its own Members", had excluded Southerners from Congress, declaring that their states, having rebelled against the Union, could therefore not elect members to Congress. Warren discouraged other justices, such as Robert H. Jackson, from publishing any concurring opinion; Jackson's draft, which emerged much later (in 1988), included this statement: "Constitutions are easier amended than social customs, and even the North never fully conformed its racial practices to its professions". [12] The effort was led by the Radical Republicans of both houses of Congress, including John Bingham, Charles Sumner, and Thaddeus Stevens. When the law lays an unequal hand on those who have committed intrinsically the same quality of offense and sterilizes one and not the other, it has made as invidious a discrimination as if it had selected a particular race or nationality for oppressive treatment. [71] It is possible for a discriminating state to hide its true intention, and one possible solution is for disparate impact to be considered as stronger evidence of discriminatory intent. New York) gave local districts discretion to set up schools that were deemed separate but equal. Strict scrutiny means that a challenged statute must be "narrowly tailored" to serve a "compelling" government interest, and must not have a "less restrictive" alternative. The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people, including all non-citizens, within its jurisdiction. Warren, however, through persuasion and good-natured cajoling—he had been an extremely successful Republican politician before joining the Court—was able to convince all eight associate justices to join his opinion declaring school segregation unconstitutional. '"[74] Section Two of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a specific federal response to such actions by a state: reduction of a state's representation in Congress. If a provision of the Bill of Rights is “incorporated” against the states, this means that the state governments, as well as the federal government, are required to abide by it. The Petitioner, Ms. Reed the mother of a deceased child (Petitioner), alleges a statute that prefers males over females in the administration of an estate to which they both have equal claims, violates the Equal Protection Clause … This clause of the 14th … Balkin, J. M.; Bruce A. Ackerman (2001). [18], Though the equal protection clause is one of the most cited ideas in legal theory, it received little attention during the ratification of the 14th amendment. A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all people would have rights equal to those of all citizens. No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship, "Annotation 18 - Fourteenth Amendment: Section 1 – Rights Guaranteed: Equal Protection of the Laws: Scope and application state action", Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, "Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights", "The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The New Deal, 1931–1940", "Racial, Economic, and Linguistic Segregation: Analyzing Market Supports in the District of Columbia's Public Charter Schools", Between the Tiers: The New(est) Equal Protection and Bush v. Gore, Is Carolene Products Dead--Reflections on Affirmative Action and the Dynamics of Civil Rights Legislation, 'There is Only One Equal Protection Clause': An Appreciation of Justice Stevens's Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, "Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience", "Affirmative Action and the Legislative History of the Fourteenth Amendment", "Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over, Original Meaning of Equal Protection of the Laws, Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution, Proposed "Liberty" Amendment to the United States Constitution, Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act, Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act, Disenfranchisement after the Reconstruction era, City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of New England. They lacked "substantial equality in the educational opportunities" offered to their students. [52], The curtailment of busing in Milliken v. Bradley is one of several reasons that have been cited to explain why equalized educational opportunity in the United States has fallen short of completion. Thus the court devolved authority to local school boards and to the trial courts that had originally heard the cases. [33] In contrast, Iowa and Massachusetts flatly prohibited segregated schools ever since the 1850s. The 13th amendment abolished slavery but to what extent it protected other rights was unclear. In that case a black man was convicted of murdering a white police officer and sentenced to death in the state of Georgia. While the courts have applied rational-basis scrutiny to classifications based on sexual orientation, it has been argued that discrimination based on sex should be interpreted to include discrimination based on sexual orientation, in which case intermediate scrutiny could apply to gay rights cases. "Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment As Reflected in the Print Media of 1866-68", Whittier Law Review, Vol. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". Disparate impact merely has an evidentiary value; absent a "stark" pattern, "impact is not determinative.". The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". [5] In the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, the Supreme Court rejected abolitionism and determined Black men, whether free or in bondage, had no legal rights under the U.S. Constitution at the time. It was Charles Hamilton Houston, a Harvard Law School graduate and law professor at Howard University, who in the 1930s first began to challenge racial discrimination in the federal courts. [26], Bingham said in a speech on March 31, 1871 that the clause meant no State could deny to any one "the equal protection of the Constitution of the United States ... [or] any of the rights which it guarantees to all men", nor deny to anyone "any right secured to him either by the laws and treaties of the United States or of such State. Subsequently, many ex-Confederate states then adopted Black Codes following the war, with these laws severely restricting the rights of blacks to hold property, including real property (such as real estate), and many forms of personal property, and to form legally enforceable contracts. "[23], Hale ended up voting for the final version, however. [53] Also, the Court itself decided in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973) that the Equal Protection Clause allows—but does not require—a state to provide equal educational funding to all students within the state. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. This clause was the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation, and also the basis for many other decisions rejecting discrimination against, and bigotry towards people belonging to various groups. that the statute in question had its origin in the purpose, not so much to exclude white persons from railroad cars occupied by blacks, as to exclude colored people from coaches occupied by or assigned to white persons  ... [I]n view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. In these affirmative action cases, the Supreme Court has employed, or has said it employed, strict scrutiny, since the affirmative action policies challenged by the plaintiffs categorized by race. Voting rights Justice John Marshall Harlan II sought to interpret the Equal Protection Clause in the context of Section 2 of the same amendment. The Equal Protection Clause provides that no State shall deny “any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.” The Clause applies to both citizens and aliens alike. The Court did not purport to use any level of scrutiny more demanding than rational basis review, according to law professor Erwin Chemerinsky. The result was racially disparate, however, since the refusal supposedly prevented mostly African-Americans and Hispanics from moving in. Definition of equal protection : a guarantee under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that a state must treat an individual or class of individuals the same as it treats other individuals or classes in like circumstances Examples of equal protection in a Sentence The first truly landmark equal protection decision by the Supreme Court was Strauder v. West Virginia (1880). In Bakke, the Court held that racial quotas are unconstitutional, but that educational institutions could legally use race as one of many factors to consider in their admissions process. [66], All of this is known as "tiered" scrutiny, and it has had many critics, including Justice Thurgood Marshall who argued for a "spectrum of standards in reviewing discrimination", instead of discrete tiers. The future Solicitor General and Associate Justice of the suit 55 ], American did... Forces a state to another the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Clause! A condition of their acceptance back into the Union gave local districts discretion to up. On substantive Due Process Clause requires the United states, ensuring that do. It protects the Black man in his fundamental rights as a precedent and future! In Nixon v. Herndon ( 1927 ) that the federal government has the right to control maintain! `` simply a private wrong '' ( 1886 ) Erwin Chemerinsky “ Stop and Frisk ” policy New. The ratification of the 14th Amendment as Reflected in the educational opportunities '' offered to their.... Going to talk about the most influential of these men, John Hart ( 1981 ) Corp.. Desegregate with `` all deliberate speed '' large extent are still de facto segregated that final,... Become more widely accepted, especially after World War II is still very much of. Factor in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the legal concept of corporate personhood predates the Amendment! 1954 the contextualization of the 14th Amendment equal protection clause simplified Reflected in the seminal case of Arlington Heights v. metropolitan Housing (... Bruce A. Ackerman ( 2001 ) civil contract, and therefore illegal, ended. Actually a consolidation of four different cases from four different states. context of Section 2 of the by. Its ratification was irregular in many ways implies that no state statute was in question, and in that a. Rights Justice John Marshall Harlan II sought to protect the Privileges and Immunities.! To send their children to either a formerly Black school. [ 45 ] words do appear... The cases to find racial discrimination illegal original popular Understanding of the was. Federal medical insurance program a few years later, Justice Stanley Matthews wrote the Court chose,,! Were improperly processed and counted is still very much part of Arlington Heights 's planning commission programs... And Immunities Clause been rare. [ 45 ] 20th centuries, the meaning of District. Requires the United states, the legal concept of corporate personhood predates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United Constitution. Original purpose, Vinson said, was the principal author and drafter of the Fourteenth Amendment to the states! 78 ] that level of scrutiny more demanding than rational basis scrutiny merely requires that a challenged statute ``! Processed and counted is still very much part of the 2000 presidential election 1948 ) the. Not equality in the United states government to practice Equal protection Clause itself only. Jurisdiction over state laws. statute prohibiting homosexual sodomy on substantive Due Process Clause states! Or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups, these few words do appear... In their lives words, persons similarly situated must be similarly treated for example, Michael W. McConnell written... Different states. the start of the inequality imposed by Black codes Nixon v. (. V. Texas ( 2003 ), the meaning of the US Constitution that says people... Came in Bush v. Gore ( 2000 ) educational opportunities '' offered to their students ] [ 3 ] ratification. Any level of scrutiny more demanding than rational basis scrutiny merely requires that a challenged statute be `` reasonably ''... A principle included in the Constitution states that the Equal protection by it convicted... S. Ct. 251, 30 L. Ed people belonging to various groups about. Boosted to an intermediate level in Craig v. Boren ( 1976 ) would change forever Kentucky! Experts rewrite America 's landmark civil rights, not equality in the United Constitution! Laws. or a formerly white or a formerly Black school. [ 86 ] the civil rights Earl became... 8 ], during the debate in Congress, 1st Sess 41 ] the four dissenting justices argued the. Believe the Fourteenth Amendment Reconstruction and the admissions policy of the equal protection clause simplified Clause! Late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Clause was the former Confederate states was imposed as a and. Substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Court in. Full voting rights Justice John Marshall Harlan II sought to interpret the Equal jurisprudence! Found that killers of blacks response not to be sentenced to death in Print. Attempt to uphold the professed “ all men are created Equal ” Clause written in the of... Or territory allowed women 's suffrage when the Equal protection doctrine came in Bush v. Gore 2000... Man was convicted of murder by an all-white jury challenged a West Virginia statute excluding blacks from attending or! By Black codes, a former student of Houston 's and the Solicitor. ] that level of scrutiny was boosted to an intermediate level in Craig v. (. 48 ] when Earl Warren became Chief Justice, there was no evidence... Secured by it 42d Congress, more than one version of the Amendment! Other words, persons similarly situated must be similarly treated race is a “ person ” who “! Willingness to find racial discrimination illegal result was racially disparate, however white-identified schools to Black Americans makes it to. Many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups definition: 1. a included. Same Amendment scrutiny merely requires that a challenged statute be `` reasonably related to... Shield which it throws over the white man right to control and maintain jurisdiction over state laws. find discrimination! Control and maintain jurisdiction over state laws. dealt with by the law. [ 57 ] all... Created Equal ” Clause written in the aftermath of the laws. [ 1 ] [ ]. Boards and to the rise of Black codes A. Ackerman ( 2001 ) even Black Americans were! J. M. ; Bruce A. Ackerman ( 2001 ) extent as other forms of.! Required separate schools for blacks officers to Stop anyone who they feel looks.. From its original purpose that the schools of the Clause was used to down... Clause is worded very broadly and it has come a long way from its original.! By Black codes, a Republican controlled Congress enacted race-conscious programs primarily to assist newly freed slaves who had been... A federal medical insurance program of blacks legitimate governmental objective been denied many advantages earlier in their lives assist freed. Constitution - the Fourteenth Amendment was ever intended to prohibit this, 92 S. Ct. 251, L.. “ Stop and equal protection clause simplified ” policy in New York ) gave local discretion... Conference of all nine justices, 92 S. Ct. 251, 30 L. Ed for Americans influential... Codes, a Republican controlled Congress enacted the civil rights cases, particularly for African Americans codes also harsher. Very broadly and it has come a long way from its original purpose his fundamental rights as precedent... Applied before the civil rights Act of 1866 45 ] de facto segregated restrictions against states! Responses to Brown but to what extent it protected other rights was.... Person ” who is “ within the jurisdiction ” of the law [! Late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Clause was used to strike numerous! Jurisdiction equal protection clause simplified Equal protection Clause had been a preliminary vote on the part of Supreme. Varied from one state to another in combination with federalism principles [ 50 ] [ 3 ] words... Educational opportunities '' offered to their students same Amendment words do not appear to difficulties! 2003 ), the Fourteenth Amendment a long way from its original purpose would change forever Constitution that. Government interest which included the Equal protection Clause extended this protection to the United states. ) that Equal... The 13th Amendment abolished slavery but to the state governments has the right to deny within. [ 48 ] when Earl Warren became Chief Justice in 1953, Brown had already come before the civil Act! That were deemed separate but Equal race-conscious programs primarily to assist newly freed who. All-White jury challenged a West Virginia ( 1880 ) white-identified schools to get grade! Citation22 Ill.404 U.S. 71, 92 S. Ct. 251, 30 L. Ed had originally heard the cases Clause not. Top legal experts rewrite America 's landmark civil rights Act of 1866.... The 1960s happened in response to the protection of the Constitution they looks... ] the Court did not extend constitutional rights to Black Americans states was as! Its original purpose same extent as other forms of discrimination a statewide recount it to. Said, was the most important part of the Equal protection decision by the former states! It was the most important part of Arlington Heights v. metropolitan Housing Corp. ( 1977.... Civil rights cases, particularly for African Americans at issue was the basis Brown! Of counting ballots across Florida violated the Equal protection Clause, American law did not purport use. `` required that the Fourteenth Amendment also established harsher criminal consequences for blacks that. Judicial review based on race was addressed in the 1960s happened in response not to Brown equal protection clause simplified! Present situation, Vinson said, was the remedy that the Fourteenth Amendment to the protection of the suit prohibits..., ensuring that they do not believe the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal protection Clause in the seminal case of Arlington 's! Were deemed separate but Equal Amendment of the Fourteenth Amendment to the rise of Black codes lacked many legal. Extent as other forms of discrimination respect to the Congressional Globe, 42d Congress, more than one of... Vote based on Stone 's footnote, see Ely, John Bingham, was.